PER CURIAM.
After the opinion in this matter was issued, following oral argument, the court's attention was called to an error in that opinion as to the juvenile's age at the time of the disposition in the trial court. The opinion stated the juvenile's age as 17 years when in fact he was 18 years old. That opinion has been corrected to recite the correct age.
Counsel for the juvenile now contends that because the juvenile was 18 years old at the time of disposition...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
