OAKLEY v. LITTLE

No. 803SC247.

272 S.E.2d 370 (1980)

J. B. OAKLEY v. J. D. LITTLE, Sr.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 2, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williamson, Herrin & Stokes by Mickey A. Herrin, Greenville, for plaintiff-appellant.

James, Hite, Cavendish & Blount by M. E. Cavendish, Greenville, for defendant-appellee.


MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Appellant contends generally that the trial court erred by granting defendant's motion for summary judgment. Under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56, summary judgment shall be rendered if the trial court determines from a consideration of the pleadings, depositions, and affidavits that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Summary judgment allows quick and final disposition of claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases