1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 264 S.E.2d
  5. 264 S.E.2d 368 (1980)
 

BEE v. YATES ALUMINUM WINDOW CO., INC.

No. 7910IC692.

264 S.E.2d 368 (1980)

46 N.C. App. 96

Charles M. BEE v. YATES ALUMINUM WINDOW CO., INC. and Virginia Mutual Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 1, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harper & Wood by William Z. Wood, Jr., Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellant.

Perry C. Henson, Jr., Greensboro, for defendant-appellees.

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns error to the Commissioner's Finding of Fact 12, and the conclusion he drew from it. The Commissioner found: "The plaintiff wished to ride the motorcycle to the shop for purely personal reasons, the plaintiff having some personal errands to perform following work that evening. In addition, it appeared that it might rain that day and the plaintiff felt his motorcycle would be better off at the shop." From this finding, the Commissioner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases