1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 262 S.E.2d
  5. 262 S.E.2d 370 (1980)
 

STATE v. ARMSTRONG

No. 7918SC703.

262 S.E.2d 370 (1980)

STATE of North Carolina v. Donald Lee ARMSTRONG.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 5, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Attorney General Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Atty. J. Chris Prather, Raleigh, for the State.

Deno Economou, Asst. Public Defender, Greensboro, for defendant-appellant.

HILL, Judge.

Defendant first assigns as error the trial court's refusal of its motion to suppress the introduction into evidence of the television set seized in the search of defendant's home. We hold the television was properly seized and introduced into evidence.

The search was pursuant to a validly issued warrant. G.S. 15A-253 provides that the scope of a search pursuant to a warrant ". . . may be only such as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases