MAGLIES v. EAST BRUNSWICK TP. PLAN. BD.


173 N.J. Super. 419 (1980)

414 A.2d 570

ROBERT MAGLIES AND CONSOLIDATED APARTMENTS, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EAST BRUNSWICK AND THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EAST BRUNSWICK IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 3, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jules S. Littman argued the cause for appellants (Arthur H. Miller, attorney).

Mitchell E. Fishman argued the cause for respondent Planning Board of the Township of East Brunswick (Gross & Novak, attorneys; David B. Greenfield on the brief).

Bertram E. Busch argued the cause for respondent Municipal Council of the Township of East Brunswick (Busch & Busch, attorneys).

Before Judges FRITZ, KOLE and LANE.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment affirming the declaration of defendant township council that plaintiffs' property was a blighted area pursuant to the Blighted Area Act, N.J.S.A. 40:55-21.1 et seq. Plaintiffs, the owners of two buildings, with six apartments in each building, located on a 3/4 of an acre lot, contend that (1) the trial judge improperly applied the Blighted Area Act to a single lot; (2) the trial judge erred in permitting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases