The defendant has moved to dismiss I-70-80, which charges him with burglary in the second degree, on the grounds that (1) he was not advised of the time and place his case would be presented to the Grand Jury and (2) that the Grand Jury proceedings were defective because they were tape recorded and not stenographically recorded (in contravention of Judiciary Law, § 325).
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.