1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 262 S.E.2d
  5. 262 S.E.2d 322 (1980)
 

STATE v. RIDDLE

No. 7924SC725.

262 S.E.2d 322 (1980)

STATE of North Carolina v. Walter RIDDLE, Robin Smith, and Michael Shane Maida.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 5, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Archie W. Anders, Raleigh, for the State.

Kyle D. Austin, Newland, for defendant-appellant Walter Riddle.

William B. Cocke, Jr., Newland, for defendant-appellant William Smith.

Edwin D. Taylor, Banner Elk, for defendant-appellant Michael Shane Maida.

ROBERT M. MARTIN, Judge.

Defendants Riddle and Maida assign as error the failure of the trial court to grant their motions for dismissal. Defendants contend the State did not introduce sufficient evidence to establish the elements of the crime of riot. Under N.C.Gen.Stat. § 14-288.2(a) the component elements that constitute the crime of riot are as follows:

(1) Public disturbance; (2) Assemblage; (3) Three or more persons; ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases