MERCER CTY. CHOSEN FREEHOLDER BD. v. MERCER CTY PROS'R


172 N.J. Super. 411 (1980)

412 A.2d 809

IN THE MATTER OF MERCER COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, APPELLANT, v. MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR, TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 102 AND AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL CIO, RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 28, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Linda Feinberg argued the cause for appellant (Harvey L. Stern, Mercer County Counsel, attorney; William L. Boyan, Assistant County Counsel, of counsel).

Robert A. Farkas, Acting First Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent Mercer County Prosecutor (Anne E. Thompson, former Mercer County Prosecutor; James F. Mulvihill, Acting Mercer County Prosecutor).

James F. Schwerin, Deputy General Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Public Employment Relations Commission (Sidney H. Lehmann, General Counsel, attorney).

Janice S. Mironov, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for intervenor-respondent State of New Jersey (John J. Degnan, Attorney General, attorney; Erminie L. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Melvin E. Mounts, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

No briefs filed on behalf of respondents Teamsters Union Local 102 and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL CIO.

Before Judges CRANE, MILMED and KING.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CRANE, P.J.A.D.

This matter was initiated by the filing of a petition with the Public Employment Relations Commission by Teamsters Union Local 102 seeking a certification that the union was the representative of the clerical, stenographic and technical employees of the Mercer County Prosecutor.

In a decision issued May 26, 1978 (which dealt also with the petition of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases