HILL v. TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH

No. 8015SC114.

269 S.E.2d 303 (1980)

48 N.C. App. 553

Arthur L. HILL and wife, Frances W. Hill v. TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 2, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Lloyd Noell, Hillsborough, for plaintiffs.

Graham & Cheshire by D. Michael Parker, Hillsborough, for defendant.


WELLS, Judge.

Defendant's main arguments are that the plaintiffs' evidence failed to establish the true boundary line between the property of the parties and that upon the evidence, plaintiffs were estopped to complain of the location of defendant's road and utility lines. It is settled law that where the case is tried by the judge without a jury, the court's findings of fact have the force and effect of a jury verdict and are conclusive on appeal if there is competent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases