Per Curiam.
The respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, First Department, on December 13, 1965. On July 24, 1979 the respondent was convicted, upon his plea of guilty in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, of being an accessory after the fact for knowingly withholding information in violation of section 3 of title 18 of the United States Code. This was based upon the respondent's failure to disclose...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.