BECKETT v. KENT COUNTY

No. G 79-455 CA 1.

488 F.Supp. 70 (1980)

Lee Euster BECKETT, Plaintiff, v. KENT COUNTY, Defendant.

United States District Court, W. D. Michigan, S. D.

January 10, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee Euster Beckett, pro se.

Shelia A. Kinney, Clary, Nantz, Wood, Hoffius, Rankin & Cooper, Grand Rapids, Mich., for defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, District Judge.

Ms. Lee Euster Beckett, plaintiff, has requested that this Court exercise its discretion pursuant to Section 706(f)(1) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) (1976), as amended, to appoint an attorney to represent her with respect to her employment discrimination claim against the defendant, Kent County, Michigan. Ms. Beckett claims that Kent County failed to hire her on account...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases