Defendant appeals from an order of the Appellate Division, two Justices dissenting, which affirmed his conviction after a jury trial of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law, § 220.39). At trial, the court refused defendant's request to charge the jury on the agency defense on the ground that there was no reasonable view of the evidence from which the jury might conclude...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
