FARM BUREAU v. WORKMEN'S COMP. BUR.

Docket No. 59815, (Calendar No. 4).

408 Mich. 141 (1980)

289 N.W.2d 699

MICHIGAN FARM BUREAU v. BUREAU OF WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided March 18, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone (by Gregory L. Curtner and Nancy N. Grekin) for plaintiffs.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Francis W. Edwards and Eileen Zielesch, Assistants Attorney General, for defendants.


RYAN, J.

The facts which underlie the issues to be decided and the decision of the lower court are fully and accurately detailed in Justice LEVIN'S concurring opinion to which reference is invited. There is no need to repeat them here.

We agreed to review this case to answer two questions:

"(1) Whether the letters of the director of the Bureau of Workmen's Compensation, establishing new rate schedules, constitute `rules' within the meaning of the Administrative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases