ROBERT M. MARTIN, Judge.
Defendants argue the court erred in denying their motions to dismiss at the close of the evidence.
The State relied on the doctrine of possession of recently stolen property. Possession of stolen property shortly after the time of the theft raises an inference of the possessor's guilt of the larceny as well as of the breaking and entering necessary to gain access to the property, which is then submitted to the jury along with other...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
