1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 262 S.E.2d
  5. 262 S.E.2d 268 (1980)
 

STATE v. HOUGH

No. 44.

262 S.E.2d 268 (1980)

STATE of North Carolina v. Curtis HOUGH.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 1, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen Bethea Galloway and Susan E. Barco, Durham, for defendant.

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Atty. Gen. Francis W. Crawley, Raleigh, for the State.

COPELAND, Justice.

By his second assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial judge erred in denying his motion to quash the indictment returned by the grand jury and to quash the petit jury venire on the grounds that the method of juror selection in Union County results in a significant under-representation of blacks1 in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. These contentions are without merit. We shall discuss defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases