1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 180 Conn.
  5. 180 Conn. 345 (1980)
 

STATE v. ASSUNTINO

180 Conn. 345 (1980)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOSEPH D. ASSUNTINO ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released April 22, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Austin J. McGuigan, chief state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, was F. Jerome O'Malley, deputy assistant state's attorney, for the appellant (state).

Howard A. Jacobs, with whom was Phoebe Boyer, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).

David A. Reif, with whom, on the brief, was Anthony J. LaSala, for the appellee (defendant Edward Compo).

Fred H. White, Jr., with whom, on the brief, were Fred H. White and Michael J. Flaminio, for the appellee (defendant Nicholas V. Carrano).

LOISELLE, BOGDANSKI, PETERS, PARSKEY and WRIGHT, Js.

PETERS, J.

This case involves interpretation of the requirement of the wiretapping and electronic surveillance statute; General Statutes § 54-41c (8)1 that applications for interception orders must contain statements of all previous wiretap applications involving the same subject. Finding a failure to disclose a previously authorized wiretap, the trial court, Levister, J. and Belinkie, J., suppressed the state's evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases