ROMAN v. CARROLL

No. 2 CA-CIV 3748.

127 Ariz. 398 (1980)

621 P.2d 307

Jane ROMAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Robert CARROLL and Grace Carroll, husband and wife, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

December 19, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of O'Neill & Martin by J. Dan O'Neill, Tucson, for plaintiff/appellant.

Slutes, Browning, Zlaket & Sakrison, P.C., by Mark R. Riegel, Tucson, for defendants/appellees.


OPINION

RICHMOND, Judge.

The question on this appeal is whether a plaintiff can recover damages for emotional distress she suffered from watching defendants' St. Bernard dismember plaintiff's poodle while she was walking the dog near her home. The poodle died two days later. In her action for damages, plaintiff/appellant alleges that she suffered severe emotional shock from witnessing the incident and that, at the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases