FASHION HOSIERY SHOPS v. W. C. A. B. ET AL.

No. 169 C.D. 1979.

55 Pa.Commw. 465 (1980)

Fashion Hosiery Shops, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board and Matilda Kurta, Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

December 19, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Linton L. Moyer, Thomson, Rhodes & Grigsby, for petitioner.

Samuel J. Goldstein, for respondent, Matilda Kurta.

Argued May 9, 1980, before Judges ROGERS, BLATT and WILLIAMS, JR., sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE WILLIAMS, JR., December 19, 1980:

This is an appeal by employer Fashion Hosiery Shops (Fashion) from an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed a referee's award of total disability compensation to claimant Matilda Kurta. The central issue is whether the place and occasion of the claimant's injury make it compensable under the "premises" provisions of Section...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases