1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 94 Wn.2d
  5. 94 Wn.2d 422 (1980)
 

LOUTHAN v. KING COUNTY

No. 46625.

94 Wn.2d 422 (1980)

617 P.2d 977

RICHARD LOUTHAN, Appellant, v. KING COUNTY, ET AL, Respondents. CHALMERS O. EKNESS, ET AL, Appellants, v. KING COUNTY, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

October 2, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Louthan, pro se.

Montgomery, Purdue, Blankinship & Austin, by John D. Blankinship, for appellants Ekness, et al.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, Richard H. Holmquist, Chief Civil Deputy, and Stephen A. Sewell, Susan R. Agid, and Stephen O. Kenyon, Deputies, for respondents.

George M. Mack on behalf of Save Our Local Farmlands Committee, amicus curiae.

HICKS, J.

These cases, consolidated on appeal, were granted direct and accelerated review in this court because of an imminent deadline in the sale of certain King County general obligation bonds. The sale was dependent upon a resolution favorable to the County of the issues raised in these actions.

The King County Council desires to preserve certain open space and farmland in King County. To achieve this objective, the council proposed to sell County general...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases