1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 82 N.J.
  5. 82 N.J. 426 (1980)
 

DARRELL v. GOVERNING BODY OF TOWNSHIP OF CLARK

82 N.J. 426 (1980)

413 A.2d 610

EDWIN S. DARRELL AND JOHN SARAFIN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GOVERNING BODY OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CLARK; EXXON CORPORATION; BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CLARK: JOSEPH SWEENEY, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CLARK, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 14, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul R. Williams, Jr., argued the cause for appellants (Williams & Flynn, attorneys).

Arnold M. Smith argued the cause for respondent Exxon Corporation.

John Pisansky argued the cause for respondent Board of Adjustment of the Township of Clark (Magner, Abraham, Orlando, Kahn & Pisansky, attorneys).

Joseph J. Triarsi argued the cause for respondents Governing Body of the Township of Clark and Joseph Sweeney (Pisano and Triarsi, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in its opinion reported at 169 N.J.Super. 127 (1978). For the guidance of the bench and bar we add the following comments.

This matter, brought under the old Municipal Planning Act, N.J.S.A. 40:55-1 et seq., involved the grant of a variance from a special exception...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases