1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 97 Wis.2d
  5. 97 Wis.2d 408 (1980)
 

HASKINS v. STATE

No. 78-656-CR.

97 Wis.2d 408 (1980)

294 N.W.2d 25

Isaac HASKINS, Jr., Plaintiff in error, v. STATE of Wisconsin, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 27, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there were briefs by William M. Coffey, Clifford R. Steele and Coffey & Coffey of Milwaukee, and oral argument by William M. Coffey and Clifford R. Steele.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by David J. Becker, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

WILLIAM G. CALLOW, J.

The principal issues on this review concern the admissibility of evidence of "other crimes" committed by the defendant's associates and the permissibility of cross-examination regarding events which form the basis of pending criminal prosecutions facing the defendant. We took this case by petition to bypass the court of appeals, consolidating it for purposes of disposition with Neely v. State,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases