STATE v. UNTERSEHER

Crim. No. 686.

289 N.W.2d 201 (1980)

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Timothy UNTERSEHER, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

February 14, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tom Tuntland, State's Atty., Mandan, for plaintiff and appellee; argued by James Johnson, Asst. State's Atty., Mandan.

Ralph A. Vinje, Bismarck, for defendant and appellant.


PEDERSON, Justice.

Timothy Unterseher was found guilty of delivery of a controlled substance in violation of §§ 19-03.1-07(4)(a) and 19-03.1-23(1)(b), NDCC, by a jury, and on this appeal claims the trial court erred in refusing to give two requested instructions relating to the defense of entrapment. We find no error. The conviction is affirmed.

Unterseher requested that the jury be instructed that:

"Entrapment can occur in either of two...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases