1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 172 N.J.
  5. 172 N.J. Super. 314 (1980)
 

TYSON v. GROZE

172 N.J. Super. 314 (1980)

411 A.2d 1170

MARSHA R. TYSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EDWARD H. GROZE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 14, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald G. Howard argued the cause for appellant (Apell, Howard and Mathews, attorneys).

Robert J. Partlow argued the cause for respondent (Parker, McCay and Criscuolo, attorneys; Ronald C. Morgan, on the brief).

Before Judges BISCHOFF, BOTTER and MORTON I. GREENBERG.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MORTON I. GREENBERG, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Marsha R. Tyson appeals from an order of the Superior Court, Law Division, granting a summary judgment in favor of defendant on the ground that this action is barred by the statute of limitations. The appeal requires this court to determine whether the provisions of N.J.S.A. 2A:14 21 extending the period for suit under N.J.S.A. 2A:14 2 have been modified by N.J.S.A.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases