1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 99 Mich.
  5. 99 Mich. App. 386 (1980)
 

SCHUTZ v. MURPHY

Docket No. 47856.

99 Mich. App. 386 (1980)

297 N.W.2d 676

SCHUTZ v. MURPHY

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided August 12, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wisti & Jaaskelainen (by Michael E. Makinen), for plaintiffs.

Bridges & Collins (by Dennis Shafer), for Arthur D. and David A. Schieber.

Before: R.B. BURNS, P.J., and MacKENZIE and J.T. KALLMAN, JJ.

R.B. BURNS, P.J.

Plaintiffs filed suit for damages arising out of defendants' alleged violation of the dramshop act and of their common law duty to maintain safe business premises. Defendant Murphy was dismissed as a defendant. Thereafter, the trial court granted defendants Schieber's motion for summary judgment as to count I. It was alleged in count I that plaintiff George Schutz was served alcoholic beverages by the defendants in violation of the dramshop act, MCL...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases