1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 73 A.D.2d
  5. 73 A.D.2d 399 (1980)
 

SCHMIDT & SONS v. LIQ AUTH

73 A.D.2d 399 (1980)

In the Matter of C. Schmidt & Sons, Incorporated, Respondent, v. New York State Liquor Authority, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 3, 1980

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley Stein of counsel (Warren B. Pesetsky, attorney), for appellant.

Arthur M. Handler of counsel (Robert S. Goodman and Oscar A. Bloustein with him on the brief; Golenbock & Barrell; Salon, Bloustein & Raybin, attorneys), for respondent.

BIRNS, J. P., FEIN, ROSS, LUPIANO and BLOOM, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

We are called upon to decide whether the determinations of the State Liquor Authority ("Authority") rejecting the application of petitioner C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc. ("Schmidt") to effect certain corporate changes ("corporate change") were arbitrary and capricious and should be annulled. We hold that the determinations of the Authority had a rational basis and therefore were not arbitrary and capricious...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases