MELENDEZ v. RODDE


176 N.J. Super. 283 (1980)

422 A.2d 1047

NADIA MELENDEZ AND RUBEN BURGOS, ADMINISTRATOR AND ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF ESTATE OF ANTONIA BURGOS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, ADAMINA RIVERA, PLAINTIFF, v. HELENA RODDE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. JOHANN LECHNER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HELENA RODDE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. JAMES McALLISTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HELENA RODDE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 15, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Isaac Henkoff argued the cause for appellant Helena Rodde (Klein, Chester, Greenburg & Henkoff, attorneys; Isaac Henkoff on the brief).

Jeffrey M. Keiser argued the cause for respondents (Ballen, Keiser & Denker, attorneys; Mark S. Gertel on the brief).

Before Judges SEIDMAN, ANTELL and LANE.


PER CURIAM.

Following a trial on damages only of these consolidated personal injury, automobile liability cases, a jury returned unanimous verdicts:

          Nadia Melendez                 $150,000
          James McAllister                  1,000
          Johann Lechner                   30,000
          Estate of Antonia Burgos         50,000

Defendant moved for a new trial on the ground that the judge failed to instruct the jury to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases