STATE v. BARNES


84 N.J. 362 (1980)

420 A.2d 303

STATE OF NEW JERSEY (CITY OF NEWARK), PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BUCK BARNES, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY (CITY OF NEWARK), PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RONALD UNDERWOOD, EMANUEL WRIGHT, JAMES WRIGHT AND EARL WRIGHT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided September 22, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas W. Matthews, Assistant Corporation Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Salvatore Perillo, Corporation Counsel, attorney; Thomas W. Matthews and Michael R. Paglione, legal intern, on the brief).

Jeffrey E. Fogel argued the cause for respondents Rutgers University-Newark, Urban Legal Clinic, attorneys).

Edwin H. Stern, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Edwin H. Stern, of counsel and on the brief; William T. Koch, Jr., legal assistant, on the brief).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by CLIFFORD, J.

The question presented is whether the State may appeal from a county court1 determination at a criminal trial de novo, R. 3:23-8, that a municipal ordinance is unconstitutional.

The defendants, Buck Barnes, Ronald Underwood, Emanuel Wright, James Wright and Earl Wright, were charged with a total of 116 violations of a Newark municipal ordinance regulating peddlers on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases