BORSH v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA

No. 15046-PR.

127 Ariz. 303 (1980)

620 P.2d 218

Joseph A. BORSH, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Sungate Development Corporation, Respondent Employer, Western Fire Insurance Company, Respondent Carrier.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

November 17, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davis & Eppstein, P.C., by Robert W. Eppstein and David Bartlett, Tucson, for petitioner.

Calvin Harris, Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Slutes, Browning, Zlaket & Sakrison, P.C. by James M. Sakrison, Tucson, for respondents Employer and Carrier.


CAMERON, Justice.

We granted Joseph A. Borsh's petition for review of a decision and opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division One, affirming the Industrial Commission's award of scheduled benefits under A.R.S. § 23-1044(B)(21). We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24, Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S., and Rule 8(b), Rules of Procedure for Special Actions, 17A A.R.S.

We must answer the following questions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases