EISENHARDT v. PAPA

No. 1525, September Term, 1979.

46 Md. App. 375 (1980)

416 A.2d 784

JAMES H. EISENHARDT v. ROSARIO J. PAPA ET UX.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

Decided July 15, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emil Hirsch, with whom was David Freishtat on the brief, for appellant.

Bayard Z. Hochberg for appellees.

The cause was argued before MOYLAN and WILNER, JJ., and IRVING H. FISHER, Associate Judge of the District Court of Maryland for District 5, specially assigned.


WILNER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

We are asked here to resolve a conflict among two principals and four principles. The principles, each clear and well set out in the law, concern the finality, "reviewability," and revision of judgments. They are:

FIRST: A judgment entered by a court that had no "jurisdiction" to enter it is absolutely void. Such a judgment, said the Court in Fooks' Executors v. Ghingher, 172 Md. 612, 619 (1937), "may...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases