1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 386 So.2d
  5. 386 So.2d 3 (1980)
 

ROLLE v. STATE

No. 77-919.

386 So.2d 3 (1980)

Ronald ROLLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 22, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, J., CHAPPELL, BILL G., Associate Judge, and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Rolle was convicted of grand larceny, and he now brings this appeal on several grounds.

One of the points raised is that Rolle's right to confront witnesses was violated when the trial judge would not allow a question of a prosecution witness for the announced purpose of showing bias and self-interest of that witness.

The proffered question was:

"Isn't it true that today you are presently under investigation, an active investigation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases