1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 264 S.E.2d
  5. 264 S.E.2d 121 (1980)
 

AUSTIN v. R. W. RAINES ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. 7926DC823.

264 S.E.2d 121 (1980)

45 N.C. App. 709

Parks N. AUSTIN, Boyd P. Falls and Walter W. Hamel, A partnership, trading as Austin, Falls & Hamel, CPA's v. R. W. RAINES ENTERPRISES, INC.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 18, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Curtis & Millsaps by Joe T. Millsaps, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee.

Lindsey, Schrimsher, Erwin, Bernhardt & Hewitt by Lawrence W. Hewitt and John W. Bedow, Charlotte, for defendant-appellant.

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant contends that the court erred in directing a verdict for plaintiff.

It is not disputed that the plaintiff rendered services to the defendant, the reasonable value of which the defendant is obligated to pay. The sole issue presented concerns the worth of the services, and the burden of proof on that issue rests on the plaintiff. The rule of law is settled in this State that the trial judge cannot direct a verdict for the party with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases