XEROX CORPORATION v. KING COUNTY

No. 45902.

94 Wn.2d 284 (1980)

617 P.2d 412

XEROX CORPORATION, Respondent, v. KING COUNTY, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

September 18, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and William C. Severson and Susan R. Agid, Deputies, for appellant.

Bogle & Gates, by D. Michael Young (John D. Hussey, of counsel), for respondent.


BRACHTENBACH, J.

This appeal involves taxation of personal property. The taxpayer paid its taxes under protest and sued for a refund pursuant to RCW 84.68.020. The trial court found that the assessor had used a fundamentally wrong method of valuation, adopted a different method which reduced the assessor's value by 16.6 percent, resulting in a refund of $68,864.84. Both parties appeal. We affirm.

Xerox, the taxpayer, manufactures, sells, and leases photocopiers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases