1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 270 S.E.2d
  5. 270 S.E.2d 98 (1980)
 

STATE v. KING

No. 24.

270 S.E.2d 98 (1980)

301 N.C. 186

STATE of North Carolina v. Richard Wayne KING.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 7, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Norma S. Harrell, for the State.

Morrow, Fraser and Reavis by Larry G. Reavis and Alvin A. Thomas, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.

BRITT, Justice.

Defendant contends by his Exceptions 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 that the trial court committed prejudicial error by admitting, over objection, evidence "of a highly speculative and inflammatory nature" that was not relevant to the case. There is no merit in this contention.

Defendant's first exception relates to the testimony of state's witness Clifford Speer. After the witness stated that he heard deceased...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases