ZATOLOKIN v. GRIMM

Docket No. 78-4734.

99 Mich. App. 257 (1980)

297 N.W.2d 900

ZATOLOKIN v. GRIMM

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided August 11, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McGinty, Halverson, Brown & Jakubiak, P.C. (by James C. Halverson), for plaintiffs.

Smith, Haughey, Rice & Roegge (by Ellen J. Eggers), for defendants Frederic A. Grimm; Landman, Grimm, Bradbury & Laurin; and Landman, Hathaway, Latimer, Clink & Robb.

Hillman, Baxter & Hammond, for defendants Robert L. Forsythe and Parmenter, Forsythe & Rude.

Before: M.J. KELLY, P.J., and D.F. WALSH and BEASLEY, JJ.


BEASLEY, J.

Plaintiffs claim damages from defendants, who are two lawfirms and certain named individual attorneys, for alleged legal malpractice. Defendant Grimm and his former lawfirm filed a motion for accelerated judgment based on the claim that the statute of limitations had run. The trial court denied this motion. Defendants-appellants, Grimm and his lawfirm, who will hereinafter be referred to as appellants, appeal by leave granted, and plaintiffs cross-appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases