1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 93 Wn.2d
  5. 93 Wn.2d 249 (1980)
 

HEATON v. IMUS

No. 46104.

93 Wn.2d 249 (1980)

608 P.2d 631

STUART D. HEATON, Respondent, v. KEN IMUS, ET AL, Petitioners.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

March 27, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Olson & Olson and Charles R. Olson, for petitioners.

Oles, Morrison, Rinker, Stanislaw & Ashbaugh, Sam E. Baker, Jr., and Arthur D. McGarry, for respondent.

WILLIAMS, J.

This case presents the question whether lost profits are recoverable by the prevailing party as part of a quantum meruit recovery in an action based on principles of quasi contract. The Court of Appeals held that lost profits are not recoverable in such an action. Heaton v. Imus, 21 Wn.App. 914, 587 P.2d 602 (1978). We reverse.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases