1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 106 Cal.App.3d
  5. 106 Cal.App.3d 213 (1980)
 

NEOGARD CORP. v. MALOTT & PETERSON-GRUNDY

Docket No. 44406.

106 Cal.App.3d 213 (1980)

164 Cal. Rptr. 813

NEOGARD CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MALOTT & PETERSON-GRUNDY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

May 28, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Halley, Cornell & Lynch, Roger C. Peter, Robert H. Cornell and Frederick A. Patterson for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Dooley, Anderson, Berg & Pardini, David M. Dooley and David B. Franklin for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

RHODES, J.*

The parties have raised a single, narrow issue: whether the State of California can temporarily prevent appellant Neogard Corporation from maintaining this lawsuit against appellee Malott & Peterson-Grundy without running afoul of the commerce clause of the United States Constitution. Specifically the issue is whether Neogard's business efforts in California from 1965 to 1974 constituted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases