STATE v. KING

No. 8019SC514.

272 S.E.2d 26 (1980)

49 N.C. App. 499

STATE of North Carolina v. Howard Franklin KING.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 18, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Daniel C. Oakley, Raleigh, for the State.

Robert M. Davis, Salisbury, for defendant-appellant.


HARRY C. MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant's first assignment of error is that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a statement made by King on the way to the station house. He argues that the court committed prejudicial error by failing to find specific facts that support the conclusions of law which allowed King's confession into evidence.

The record reveals that a voir dire hearing was conducted, upon defendant's objection to testimony, to determine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases