1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 93 Wn.2d
  5. 93 Wn.2d 199 (1980)
 

BALFOUR, GUTHRIE AND COMPANY, LIMITED v. COMMERCIAL METALS CO.

No. 46338.

93 Wn.2d 199 (1980)

607 P.2d 856

BALFOUR, GUTHRIE AND COMPANY, LIMITED, Respondent, v. COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

March 13, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hay & Epstein, by John L. Hay, for appellant.

Blair, Schaefer, Hutchison, Wynne, Potter, Horton & Johnson, by Hugh J. Potter (Lloyd W. Weisensee and John Dudrey of Fredrickson, Weisensee & Cox, of counsel), for respondent.

BRACHTENBACH, J.

This litigation involves two arbitration issues not before decided in Washington. First, may a court order consolidated multi-party arbitration, in a location other than that to which the parties have agreed, in contravention of the terms of the parties' contractual provisions? Second, may a court order discovery proceedings on the merits of the controversies after finding that the parties are bound by arbitration clauses in their respective contracts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases