IN THE MATTER OF THE REVISION OF RATES FILED BY TOMS RIVER WATER COMPANY INCREASING ITS RATES FOR WATER SERVICE.
TOMS RIVER WATER COMPANY, RESPONDENT,
v.
NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued January 7, 1980.
Decided March 11, 1980.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Bertram P. Goltz, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).
Alfred L. Nardelli, Deputy Public Advocate, argued the cause for respondent Public Advocate (Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Advocate, attorney; Anne S. Babineau, Assistant Deputy Public Advocate, and Alfred L. Nardelli, on the briefs).
William C. Davis argued the cause for respondent Toms River Water Company (Davis & Reberkenny, attorneys; John S. Fields and William D. Lavery, Jr., on the briefs).
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
The opinion of the Court was delivered by PASHMAN, J.
Last Term, our decision in In re Lambertville Water Co.,79 N.J. 449 (1979), raised but declined to resolve the issue whether the Board of Public Utility Commissioners (Board) may give retroactive effect to an approved increase in a utility's rates. See id. at 457. We now address that issue. A second, related question before us is whether a utility's application for...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
