1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 62 Ohio
  5. 62 Ohio St. 2d 218 (1980)
 

CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION

No. 79-1352.

62 Ohio St. 2d 218 (1980)

CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 21, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Daniel J. Krolick, for appellants.

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Jeffrey I. Sherwin, for appellees Cuyahoga County Board of Revision and Cuyahoga County Auditor.

Mr. Morton M. Stotter, for appellee Great Northern Partnership.

Per Curiam.

This court has held that only complainants before the board of revision have standing to appeal a determination by that body to the Board of Tax Appeals.1 Bd. of Edn. v. Bd. of Revision (1973), 34 Ohio St.2d 231;2 Lindblom v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1949), 151 Ohio St. 250. The issue remains in the instant cause, however...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases