1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 25 Wn.
  5. 25 Wn. App. 248 (1980)
 

MERRICK v. PETERSON

No. 6926-8-I.

25 Wn. App. 248 (1980)

606 P.2d 700

IVAN E. MERRICK, as Administrator, ET AL, Respondents, v. THEODORE A.L. PETERSON, ET AL, Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

As amended by order February 14, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin D. Fox and Abbey & Fox, for appellants.

Larry C. Leonardson, Dodel, Skone, Leonardson & Perkins, and Michael L. Olver, for respondents.

[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals February 14, 1980.]

DORE, J.

This is an action by plaintiff assignees to enforce the provisions of a promissory note.

ISSUES

1. Whether plaintiffs, owners of a promissory note, are holders in due course.

2. Whether plaintiffs' claim is barred due to violations of security laws.

3. Did the trial court err when it denied defendants' jury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases