SOGNIER, Judge.
1. Going first to appellant's Enumeration 3, we do not believe that either Charge 6 as requested by appellee and given or Charge 1, requested by appellant and not given, correctly stated the applicable law. The instruction as given was not a full statement of the law relating to the right of ingress and egress, as it did not enunciate the principle that a property owner is not necessarily entitled to ingress and egress to his property at all points...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
