1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 64 Ohio
  5. 64 Ohio St. 2d 179 (1980)
 

STATE v. DIEHL

No. 80-479.

64 Ohio St. 2d 179 (1980)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. DIEHL, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 23, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James A. Berry, prosecuting attorney, and Ms. Catherine B. Wilder, for appellant.

Mr. J. Tullis Rogers and Ms. Elizabeth Manton, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

We agree with the Court of Appeals that the accusations of McGhee, contained in the transcript of his grand jury testimony, and admitted in subsequent testimony, were not corroborated, as required by R. C. 2923.03(D). Therefore, we need not decide whether either the transcript or Frances Byerman's testimony was admissible.

R. C. 2923.03(D) changed the common law in Ohio.2 It states that no conviction may be based...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases