STATE v. ROBERTS

Nos. 79-838 and 79-931.

62 Ohio St. 2d 170 (1980)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND APPELLEE, v. ROBERTS, APPELLEE AND APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 14, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. George J. Sadd, for the state of Ohio.

Mr. Thomas M. Shaughnessy, Mr. Jay B. White, Mr. James R. Willis, and Mr. William L. Summers, for defendant Roberts.


I.

HERBERT, J.

In case No. 79-838, the state argues that defendant's conviction for the possession of a narcotic drug for sale was erroneously set aside by the Court of Appeals. In essence, the state's assertion is founded upon the proposition that the offenses of possession of a narcotic drug for sale, R. C. 3719.20(A),1 and the sale of a narcotic drug, R. C. 3719.20(B),2 were not in this cause ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases