YOUNG v. SECKLER


74 A.D.2d 155 (1980)

Martin Young et al., Appellants, v. Clare Seckler et al., Defendants; Stanley Seckler, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 31, 1980


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur L. Kagan for appellants.

Bower & Gardner (Ignatius John Melito and Patrick J. Kenny of counsel), for respondent.

LAZER, MANGANO and RABIN, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion; DAMIANI, J. P., concurs in the result, with an opinion, in which O'CONNOR, J., concurs.


Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs in this automobile negligence action have alleged that the husband of the registered owner of the offending vehicle is the actual owner and they have, therefore, named him as a defendant. It is undisputed from papers submitted on the instant summary judgment motion that the funds for the purchase and subsequent maintenance of the car were provided by the husband. His position is undoubtedly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases