1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 101 Cal.App.3d
  5. 101 Cal.App.3d 128 (1980)
 

MATOSSIAN v. FAHMIE

Docket No. 44033.

101 Cal.App.3d 128 (1980)

161 Cal. Rptr. 532

JOSEPH MATOSSIAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. JOSEPH FAHMIE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

January 17, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

H. Tim Hoffman, Gregory Wilcox and Arthur W. Lazear for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon, Paul H. Cyril, Joseph B. Phair, Moore, Clifford, Wolfe, Larson & Trutner, J. Jay Schnack, Barfield, Barfield, Dryden & Ruane, Mattathias N. Smith, Ericksen, Mackenroth & Arbuthnot, R. Opre Wilson, Jr., and Robert G. Levy for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

ELKINGTON, J.

(1a) The question of this appeal is whether holders of licenses to purvey alcoholic beverages have a right, in combination, to protest the granting, or transfer, of a similar license for the sole purpose of preventing or limiting competition. We conclude they have such a right of protest and affirm the judgment of the superior court. Our reasons follow.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases