GHEN v. PIASECKI


172 N.J. Super. 35 (1980)

410 A.2d 708

GREGORY S. GHEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ANIELA PIASECKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 18, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Bodnar argued the cause for appellant (James Logan, Jr. on the brief).

Leonard T. Schwartz argued the cause for respondent (Taylor, Kotlikoff & Schwartz, attorneys).

Before Judges BISCHOFF, BOTTER and DWYER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by, DWYER, J.A.D.

Defendant Aniela Piasecki appeals from the judgment in favor of plaintiff Gregory S. Ghen determining that Ghen has an easement by way of necessity from Ghen's interior seven-acre parcel across Mrs. Piasecki's 23-acre parcel to reach Tomlinson-Mills Road. The judgment established the easement as:

... [A] right-of-way [with a] width of 50 feet to accommodate a roadway for modern motor vehicles, said...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases