KROEPIL v. UNEMPL. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW

No. 2330 C.D. 1978.

50 Pa.Commw. 152 (1980)

Godfrey J. Kroepil, Jr., Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Eastman Restaurant Company, Intervening Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

March 14, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Mazero, Jr., with him Patrick H. Mahady of Mahady & Mahady, for petitioner.

Gary Marini, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Phillip J. Binotto, Jr., of Greenlee, Richman, Derrico & Posa, for intervening respondent.

Argued February 8, 1980, before Judges WILKINSON, JR., MENCER and CRAIG, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE CRAIG, March 14, 1980:

This is a petition to review the affirmance by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of a referee's denial of unemployment compensation benefits to claimant, Mr. Kroepil, under Section 402(b) (1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Act), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess. P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. § 802(b) (1), on the basis that he had quit his job as a restaurant manager without cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases