MALHAME v. BOROUGH OF DEMAREST


174 N.J. Super. 28 (1980)

415 A.2d 358

JOHN F. MALHAME AND LESLIE MALHAME, HIS WIFE; WILLIAM PECORARO AND JUDITH PECORARO, HIS WIFE; AND ARNOLD ZIMMERMAN AND CATHERINE ZIMMERMAN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BOROUGH OF DEMAREST, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 27, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan N. Harris argued the cause for appellant (Andora, Palmisano, DeCotiis & Harris, attorneys; M. Robert DeCotiis of counsel; Jonathan N. Harris on the briefs).

Antranig Aslanian, Jr., argued the cause for respondents.

Before Judges CRANE, MILMED and KING.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, residents of the Borough of Demarest (borough), sued to enjoin the borough from continuing the use of a fire alarm system which, they charge, constitutes a nuisance. They also sought, among other things, judgment directing the borough "to take immediate steps to inaugurate an alternate system." After a nonjury trial, the trial judge filed his opinion which is reported at 162 N.J.Super. 248 (Law Div...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases