1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 102 Cal.App.3d
  5. 102 Cal.App.3d 100 (1980)
 

DE WEESE v. UNICK

Docket No. 56842.

102 Cal.App.3d 100 (1980)

162 Cal. Rptr. 259

MELLIS ANN DE WEESE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TIMOTHY ALAN UNICK, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

February 13, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

W. Edmund Parent II for Defendant and Appellant.

George Deukmejian, Attorney General, Robert H. Philibosian, Chief Assistant Attorney General, S. Clark Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Norman H. Sokolow, Andrew D. Amerson, Deputy Attorneys General, Stanley M. Roden, District Attorney and Bonnie Baker, Deputy District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

STEPHENS, Acting P.J.

On May 12, 1970, a child was born to Mellis Ann De Weese (hereinafter De Weese), who at that time was not married. A paternity suit was commenced by De Weese in the Santa Barbara Superior Court naming Timothy Alan Unick (hereinafter Unick) as the father. A blood test was taken by the parties in the early part of October 1974, the results of which did not exclude the possibility of Unick's paternity. Through...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases